4.5 Article

Quality of life assessments in Major Depressive Disorder: a review of the literature

期刊

GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 13-17

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2003.07.004

关键词

quality of life; major depression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to the DSM-IV classification, a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is possible only when there is evidence of significant inference with functioning. However, despite the high prevalence of MDD in the general population [1], it is uncommon for clinicians to assess overall functioning in a systematic way before making such diagnosis. An important correlate of functioning is quality of life, which is typically defined as patients' own assessments of how they feel about what they have, how they are functioning, and their ability to derive pleasure from their life activities [2]. In the present article, we review studies focusing on the relationship between depression and quality of life, particularly focusing on the impact of the treatment of depression on quality of life. Studies focusing on the quality of life in MDD are reviewed. Candidate studies published between 1970 and recently were initially identified by Pubmed and Ovid search cross-referencing the terms quality of life, psychosocial functioning with major depression and treatment. A number of studies report poorer quality of life in MDD patients compared to controls. Several studies also report an improvement in quality of life measures during various phases of treatment with antidepressants and/or psychotherapy. However, trials comparing the role of newer psychopharmacologic agents in the acute phase of treatment, and the role of newer psychotherapies in the continuation and maintenance phases of treatment in restoring psychosocial functioning and improving the quality of life in MDD are lacking. Exploring the impact of these modalities on psychosocial function and quality of life in MDD are necessary to help translate clinical response into restoration of psychosocial function and to thus further improve the standard of care. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据