4.6 Article

P-T-f(O2) controls on a partly inverse chromite-bearing ultramafic intrusive: an evaluation from the Sukinda Massif, India

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 483-493

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1367-9120(03)00088-9

关键词

Sukinda ultramafites; chromite oxidations; oxygen fugacity; upper mantle heterogeneity; ol-sp geothermometry; boninitic magma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The chromites from the alpine type ultramafic intrusive of Sukinda, India, display a typical partly inverse spinel form and occur in two distinct zones: Brown Ore Zone (BOZ) and Grey Ore Zone (GOZ). The host ultramafites are mostly altered and are represented by the serpentinite, tremolite-talc(chlorite) schist, talc-serpentine schist and chlorite rock. The less altered variants are dunite, harzburgite and websterite. A dyke of orthopyroxenite runs through the main ultrarnafic body. The composition of olivine (Fo(92)), orthopyroxene (En(92-89)) and Al2O3 contents of the parental liquid (10.40-11.45%) determined from chromites, suggest that the parent melt is of boninitic affinity. The chemical plot of TiO2 content against cr# of chromites corroborates a boninitic parental melt. The Fe-Mg partitioning in olivine and chromite depicts the temperature for chromitites as 1200 degreesC. A compositional plot of mg# and cr# suggests crystallization at high pressure conditions, corresponding to the kimberlite xenolith field. From the P-T diagram of pyrolite melting and mineral assemblage, the pressure of crystallization is stipulated to be greater than or equal to 1.2 GPa. The f(O2) values estimated from Fe3+/Cr + Al + Fe3+ ratios range from 10(-8.3) to 10(-9.3) for the GOZ and 10(-7.1) to 10(-7.3) for the BOZ. The f(O2) values together with the pressure range suggest crystallization at upper mantle conditions. The heterogeneity in chemical composition and f(O2) conditions for the GOZ and BOZ could be linked to heterogeneity in the upper mantle. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All fights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据