4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Structure, reactivity and catalytic properties of nanoparticles of nickel ferrite in the dry reforming of methane

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 188-195

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.06.002

关键词

Nickel ferrite; Dry reforming of methane; Disordered spinel; Behavior in reducing atmosphere

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nickel ferrite NiFe2O4 (spinel) was prepared and characterized by several physicochemical methods, and its catalytic properties were investigated in the reforming of methane with CO2 to syngas. Nanoparticles were prepared by coprecipitation (CP), hydrothermal synthesis (HT) and sol-gel process (SG). The methods of preparation influenced strongly the textural and structural properties, as well as their reactivity. X-ray diffraction patterns showed that only HT and SG methods delivered pure NiFe2O4 nanoparticles (6-10 nm size). However the cell parameter a calculated by Rietveld analysis being respectively larger (HT) or smaller (SG) than the standard value, a non stoichiometric defective mixed spinel could have been formed. The reducibility of samples was studied by two methods. H-2-temperature programmed reduction showed the formation of Ni-0 at increased temperature along SG approximate to HT < CP series, after which step NixFe2-xO4 decomposed to iron suboxides and finally to Fe-0. In situ reduction by H-2 carried out by HT-XRD showed that the ultimate compound was gamma-NixFe1-x alloy, formed above 400 (SG, HT) or 450 degrees C (CP). The catalytic activity in the dry reforming of methane was higher with HT and SG than with CP, but values of conversion of CH4 and CO2 were low as compared with efficient catalysts in the literature. After being pre-reduced by hydrogen at 400 degrees C, a large improvement was observed with SG sample only, in which case the conversions of methane and CO2 at 800 degrees C amounted to 80 and 93 mol%, respectively, with H-2/CO = 1.2. (C) 2012 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据