4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Identification of Hordeum spontaneum QTL alleles improving field performance of barley grown under rainfed conditions

期刊

ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY
卷 144, 期 3, 页码 309-319

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2004.tb00346.x

关键词

Hordeum vulgare; Hordeum spontaneum; quantitative trait locus (QTL); advanced backcross QTL analysis (AB-QTL analysis); drought stress; grain yield

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advanced backcross QTL (AB-QTL) analysis was deployed to identify allelic variation in wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum) of value in the improvement of grain yield and other agronomically important traits in barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare) grown under conditions of water deficit in Mediterranean countries. A population of 123 double haploid (DH) lines obtained from BC,F, plants derived from a cross between Barke (European two-row cultivar) and HOR11508 (wild barley accession) were tested in replicated field trials, under varying conditions of water availability in Italy, Morocco and Tunisia, for seven quantitative traits. Significant QTL effects at one (P less than or equal to 0.001) or more trial sites (P less than or equal to 0.01) were identified for all traits. At 42 (52%) of the 80 putative QTLs identified, the allele increasing a traits' value was contributed by H. spontaneum. For example, though the majority (67%) of QTL alleles increasing grain yield were contributed by H. vulgare, H. spontaneum contributed the alleles increasing grain yield at six regions on chromosomes 2H, 3H, 5H and 7H. Among them, two QTLs (associated to Bmac0093 on chromosome 2H and to Bmac0684 on chromosome 5H) were identified in all three locations and had the highest additive effects. The present study shows the validity of deploying AB-QTL analysis for identifying favourable QTL alleles from wild germplasm and indicates its potential as an enhancement strategy for the genetic improvement of cultivars better adapted to drought-prone environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据