4.7 Article

Generalized synthesis of core-shell structured nano-zeolite@ordered mesoporous silica composites

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 2-7

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.09.031

关键词

Zeolite; Mesoporous silica; Core-shell; Synthesis

资金

  1. NSF of China [20890123]
  2. State Key Basic Research Program of the PRC [2009AA033701, 2009CB930400]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [08DZ2270500]
  4. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B108]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel core-shell structured composite molecular sieves comprising mono-dispersed nano-sized zeolite single-crystals (i.e., nano-zeolite Y) as cores and ordered mesoporous silica as shells were synthesized via a surfactant-directed sol-gel process in basic media by using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as a template and tetraethyl-orthosilicate (TEOS) as a precursor. Uniform mesoporous silica shells are coated on the mono-dispersed nano-zeolites to form the hierarchical porous structures, the thickness of which can be tailored depending on the adding amount of TEOS. The composite molecular sieves with the thickness of 20 nm possess ultra high surface area of 1198 m(2)/g, ordered mesopores (similar to 3.5 nm in diameter) from the silica shell and uniform micropores (similar to 0.9 nm) from nano-zeolite core. The ordered mesopore channels in the shells are annularly vertical to the nano-zeolite crystal-faces. On the other hand, the nano-zeolite@mesoporous silica composite molecular sieves with such high surface area and opened hierarchical pores, can provide sufficient voids for capturing reactant molecules and also promote molecule diffusion from mesopores to micropores. Thus, the composite molecular sieves show greatly enhanced adsorption capacity (4.7 mmol/g) for large molecules such as benzene relative to that of pristine nano-zeolites (3.0 mmol/g), ascribing to the large contribution from mesopores in the shell. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据