4.0 Article

Regulation of the human leukemia inhibitory factor gene by ets transcription factors

期刊

NEUROIMMUNOMODULATION
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 10-19

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000072964

关键词

leukemia inhibitory factor; Jurkat cells; ets

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is a pleiotropic cytokine mainly produced by activated T lymphocytes. We previously demonstrated that human Jurkat T lymphoma cells represent a valid model of LIF gene expression. This study was designed to identify regions critical for LIF promoter activation in Jurkat cells. Methods: Luciferase constructs under the control of different portions of the human LIF promoter were transfected into Jurkat cells, and promoter activity was determined by luminometry. Similar experiments were performed with constructs bearing mutations in the putative ets binding regions in the LIF promoter. RT-PCR, Western blot and gelshift experiments were performed to study expression and DNA binding of ets factors in lymphoid cells. Results: With the exception of the shortest construct not including the putative ets binding sites, all wildtype LIF promoter constructs were strongly inducible by phorbol ester/ionomycin. In contrast, the mutant constructs were significantly less inducible. Cotransfection of the wild-type constructs with ets expression vectors resulted in significant enhancement of promoter activity. ets-1 and ets-2 mRNA and protein were shown to be expressed in Jurkat cells. Gelshift experiments revealed that proteins present in nuclear extracts from Jurkat cells specifically bind to both artificial ets consensus sites and ets binding sites present in the LIF promoter. Conclusions: We conclude that binding of ets transcription factors to the ets binding sites in the human LIF promoter is critical for its inducibility in response to T cell activators. ets transcription factors thus play an important functional role within the endocrine-immune network. Copyright (C) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据