4.6 Article

Anxiety and depressive disorders and the five-factor model of personality: A higher- and lower-order personality trait investigation in a community sample

期刊

DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 92-97

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/da.20026

关键词

anxiety; anxiety disorders; depression; depressive disorder; neurotic disorders; personality; personality inventory

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [K23-MH64543, R01-MH47447, R01-MH50616] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH047447, R01MH050616, K23MH064543] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [Z01AG000184, ZIAAG000184] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe in detail normal personality traits in persons with psychiatrist-ascertained anxiety and depressive disorders in a general population sample. We investigated Revised NEO Personality Inventory traits in 731 community subjects examined by psychiatrists with the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. All of the lifetime disorders of interest (simple phobia, social phobia, agoraphobia, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD), and dysthymia) were associated with high neuroticism. Social phobia, agoraphobia, and dysthymia were associated with low extraversion, and OCD was associated with high openness to experience. In addition, lower-order facets of extraversion (E), openness (O), agreeableness (A), and conscientiousness (C) were associated with certain disorders (specifically, low assertiveness (E) and high openness to feelings (O) with MDD, low trust (A) with social phobia and agoraphobia, low self-discipline (C) with several of the disorders, and low competence and achievement striving (C) with social phobia). Neuroticism in particular was related to acuity of disorder. Longitudinal study is necessary to differentiate state versus pathoplastic effects. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据