4.7 Article

FT-IR characterization of supported Ni-catalysts: Influence of different supports on the metal phase properties

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 197, 期 1, 页码 38-49

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.06.016

关键词

Ni catalysts; CO; CO2; CH3CN; FT-IR spectroscopy

资金

  1. Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supported Ni catalysts (2 wt.% Ni) were investigated by FT-IR and UV-vis-NIR spectroscopy, using CO2, CH3CN and CO as probe molecules. The supports studied range from acidic (SiO2), via amphoteric (Al2O3, Mg(Al)O) to basic oxides (MgO, CaO). CO2 adsorption experiments allowed to obtain the following qualitative scale for the basic strength of O-2-sites and Mn+O2- pairs: Ni/CaO > Ni/MgO >= Ni/Mg(Al)O >> Ni/Al2O3. On Ni/SiO2 these sites are absent. CH3CN adsorption allowed to reveal acidic and strong basic Lewis sites with the following results: Ni/SiO2 does not contain basic or acidic Lewis sites. Ni/Al2O3 contains acidic Lewis sites but no strong basic Lewis sites. The ratio between the strong basic and the acidic Lewis sites decreases in the order: Ni/MgO > Ni/CaO > Ni/Mg(Al)O. The strength of Lewis acid sites decreases in the order Ni/Al2O3 >> Ni/Mg(Al)O > Ni/MgO > Ni/CaO. Interaction of CO at room temperature results into formation of Ni(CO)(4) and/or Ni(CO)(y < 4) subcarbonyls. In the case of Ni/SiO2 and Ni/Al2O3, the sub-carbonyls are weakly interacting with the support. For the other supports, Ni(CO)(4) and Ni(CO)(y < 4) sub-carbonyls are stabilized on the metal oxide and give rise to mono-and poly-nuclear complexes (containing 2 or 3 Ni atoms). On Ni/Mg(Al)O, even larger Ni clusters seem to be formed. The support capability of stabilizing mono- and poly-nuclear complexes can be ranked as follows: SiO2 << Al2O3 < Mg(Al)O < CaO < MgO. A reactivity scale of the Ni-0 particles with CO is also proposed: Ni/SiO2 << Ni/Al2O3 < Ni/Mg(Al)O approximate to Ni/CaO < Ni/MgO. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据