4.0 Article

Behavioural responses of moose to thermal conditions in the boreal forest

期刊

ECOSCIENCE
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 321-328

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2004.11682839

关键词

activity rate; air temperature; Alces alces; global warming; habitat use; solar radiation; thermal stress; thermoregulation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among ungulate species living in boreal regions, moose (Alces alces) are most likely to suffer from heat stress since they have a relatively low upper critical temperature (14 degreesC in summer and -5 degreesC in winter). We tested the hypothesis that moose adopt behaviours to reduce thermoregulatory costs. We predicted that moose exposed to high intensities of solar radiation or high air temperatures would 1) seek a type of vegetation association that provides thermal shelter and 2) reduce activity. We also predicted that these behaviours would be most evident in summer. Thermal-shelter use and activity of 30 free-ranging moose were measured over 3 y in a 940-km(2) study area of boreal forest using GPS telemetry collars. The effect of solar radiation and air temperature on thermal-shelter use and activity were assessed using logistic and multiple regression analyses. Habitat use and activity rates of moose were related to air temperature but not solar radiation. The probability of finding moose in thermal shelters increased with air temperature in summer and fall. Moose activity did not decrease as air temperature increased, but it increased at night during hot periods. As expected, moose response to thermal conditions was most noted in summer. Our results suggest that moose reduce exposure to thermal stress by using thermal shelters during the day and by increasing nocturnal activity. These behavioural adaptations allow moose to cope with thermal stress on a small temporal scale. Negative effects of heat stress could be important in areas where air temperatures are very high for extended periods of time or where thermal cover is scarce.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据