4.7 Article

Rotating disc electrode studies of borohydride oxidation at Pt and bimetallic Pt-Ni and Pt-Co electrodes

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 170, 期 1, 页码 126-133

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.01.003

关键词

Platinum catalysts; Bimetallic catalysts; Galvanic replacement; Borohydride oxidation

资金

  1. GammaGammaET Greece
  2. Ministry of Education, Greece

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electrochemical oxidation of borohydride has been studied by means of voltammetry at Pt and Pt-Ni, Pt-Co bimetallic rotating disc electrodes (RDEs). The bimetallic catalysts are prepared by means of a galvanic replacement method (whereby electrodeposited Ni and Co layers are partially replaced by Pt when immersed in a chloroplatinic solution) and are shown to have a Pt shell-bimetallic alloy core. The effects of electrode history, potential scan direction, rotation speed and electrode material on borohydride oxidation have been investigated. For all Pt-based catalysts tested a gradual decrease of the voltammetric current from its initial value to a steady state response is observed in the kinetic control potential region, irrespective of scan direction and rotation speed. The initial deactivation of the catalyst at low overpotentials as well as the shape of the initial and steady-state voltammograms in that region point to the heterogeneous hydrolysis of borohydride and the subsequent oxidation of its products. As the catalytic activity for the hydrolysis reaction decreases the voltammograms shift to more positive potentials where direct borohydride oxidation dominates. The bimetallic Pt-Ni and Pt-Co catalysts exhibit a more negative open circuit potential and higher oxidation currents at low overpotentials than Pt, but lower apparent number of electrons transferred in the mass transport control region. These findings can be interpreted by the lowering of the d-band energy level of Pt in the presence of Ni and Co and the associated decrease in its adsorption affinity. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据