4.5 Article

Thermal stability of wheat gluten protein: its effect on dough properties and noodle texture

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 9-19

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0733-5210(03)00058-4

关键词

gluten; glutenin; noodle; thermostability; viscoelasticity; wheat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a need to develop more sensitive and reliable tests to help breeders select wheat lines of appropriate quality. Gluten thermostability, measured by the viscoelasticity of heated gluten, was assessed for its usefulness in evaluating quality of wheats in breeding programs. Two sets of wheat samples were used: Set I consisting of 20 cultivars and/or breeders' lines (BL), with diverse dough strengths and allelic variations of high M-r glutenin subunits coded at the Glu-A1, Glu-B1 and Glu-D1 loci (N = 20) and Set II consisting of 16 near isogenic BL of F7 generation that had been in a quality selection program for three years. Thermostability of the isolated wet gluten was determined by measuring its viscoelastic properties, and was related to noodle texture, flour protein content, protein composition, dough physical properties and other quality predicting tests. Viscoelasticity of heat-treated gluten, isolated with 2% NaCl solution, significantly correlated with most of the tests used to measure dough and/or gluten strength and Chinese white salted noodle texture. The rate of thermal denaturation of proteins depends on M-r and packing density. High ratios of monomeric proteins such as gliadins and low M-r glutenin subunits to high M-r glutenin subunits increase the thermostability of the gluten. The measurement of viscoelasticity of heat-denatured gluten can be a useful test to determine gluten quality. Our study showed that gluten viscoelasticity and most of the tests related to dough and/or gluten strength are independent of allelic variations of the high molecular weight glutenin subunits. This test has been developed for predicting white salted noodle quality. Crown Copyright (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据