4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Flame-made vs wet-impregnated vanadia/titania in the total oxidation of chlorobenzene Possible role of VOx species

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 157, 期 1-4, 页码 198-203

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.01.029

关键词

Flame spray pyrolysis; VOC abatement; V2O5/TiO2; Raman spectroscopy; XPS; Polymeric vanadia; V-O-V bonds; Dioxin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vanadia/titania particles with a specific surface area (SSA) around 50 m(2) g(-1) and a V2O5 content up to 30 wt % (corresponding to a V surface density up to 33 V nm(-2)) were prepared by flame spray pyrolysis as well as by classic wet-impregnation The catalysts were characterized by nitrogen adsorption X-ray diffraction temperature programmed reduction Raman spectroscopy X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and tested in the total oxidation of chlorobenzene Depending on vanadia content monomeric polymeric and crystalline vanadia species were formed The dispersion of the VOx species was in general higher for flame-made catalysts While the classic wet-impregnated catalysts already showed crystalline V2O5 when the V surface density reaches 8 V nm(-2) the flame-made ones exhibited only amorphous VOx species up to 16 V nm(-2) The activity of flame-made and wet-impregnated catalysts Increased with increasing V2O5 loading and therefore depended on the VOx species structure catalysts exceeding a V surface density of 8 V nm(-2) containing high amounts of amorphous polymeric and/or crystalline VOx species showed significantly higher activity than catalysts with lower V surface density Wet-impregnated catalysts with numerous V-O-V bonds as involved in polymeric and crystalline VOx species showed superior activity than FSP-made ones of similar composition This contribution proposes a discussion aiming at understanding the role played by the different types of VOx species in the total oxidation of volatile organic compounds on the example of chlorobenzene (C) 2010 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据