4.0 Article

Reproducibility of blood pressure variability, white-coat effect and dipping pattern in untreated, uncomplicated and newly diagnosed essential hypertension

期刊

BLOOD PRESSURE
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 214-224

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08037050410021432

关键词

ambulatory blood pressure; hypertension; nocturnal fall; reproducibility; variability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the reproducibility of blood pressure (BP) variability, white-coat effect (WCE) and nocturnal dipping pattern in untreated patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension using 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Methods: Seventy-five newly diagnosed, untreated essential hypertensive subjects (54 men, 21 women 47.6+/-9.3 years) were recruited for the study based on conventional measured BP from a total of 180 patients referred for ABPM. Of these, 65 patients underwent repeated ABPM after 4 weeks observation without treatment. Reproducibility of BP, nocturnal dipping pattern, WCE and BP variability were assessed using different methods. Results: The average 24-hour BP (140.8+/-11.9/91.8+/-6.4 vs. 140.5+/-14.5/90.7+/-7.6 mmHg, ns) or PP (49.6+/-10.8 vs. 49.8+/-9.8 mmHg, ns) did not change, nor did daytime BP or PP. The WCE diminished significantly during the observation period (reduction in SBP WCE Delta8.2+/-12.5 mmHg, p<0.0001, in DBP WCE, Delta 3.3 +/- 9.2 mmHg, p=0.008 and in PP WCE Delta 4.8 +/- 11.2 mmHg, p=0.002). Variability in SBP, DBP and PP decreased consistently and significantly during the observation period. The nocturnal dipping pattern was unchanged in 82% of the patients. In 12% non-dipping pattern was converted to dipping pattern after repeated measurement. Conclusion: Average ABPs are highly reproducible in patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension of limited duration. Similarly, nocturnal dipping pattern reproduced satisfactorily. These measures have important clinical applicability. The white-coat effect as well as variability are greatly attenuated during repeated measurements, and these measures may thus be of less utility in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据