4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Kinetics of CO and H2 oxidation over CuO-CeO2 catalyst in H2 mixtures with CO2 and H2O

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 132, 期 1-4, 页码 109-116

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.12.028

关键词

PROX; CO oxidation; H-2 oxidation; CO clean-up; CuO-CeO2; kinetics; reaction model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The kinetics of CO and H-2 oxidation over a CuO-CeO2 catalyst were simultaneously investigated under reaction conditions of preferential CO oxidation (PROX) in hydrogen-rich mixtures with CO2 and H2O. An integral packed-bed tubular reactor was used to produce kinetic data for power-law kinetics for both CO and H-2 oxidations. The experimental results showed that the CO oxidation rate was essentially independent of H-2 and O-2 concentrations, while the H-2 oxidation rate was practically independent of CO and O-2 concentrations. In the CO oxidation, the reaction orders were 0.91, -0.37 and -0.62 with respect to the partial pressure of CO, CO2 and H2O, respectively. In the H-2 oxidation, the orders were 1.0, -0.48 and -0.69 with respect to the partial pressure Of H-2, CO2 and H2O, respectively. The activation energies of the CO oxidation and the H-2 oxidation were 94.4 and 142 kJ/mol, respectively. The rate expressions of both oxidations were able to predict the performance of the PROX reactor with accuracy. The independence between the CO and the H-2 oxidation suggested different sites for CO and H-2 adsorption on the CuO-CeO2 catalyst. Based on the results, we proposed a new reaction model for the preferential CO oxidation. The model assumes that CO adsorbs selectively on the Cu+ sites; H-2 dissociates and adsorbs on the Cu-0 sites; the adsorbed species migrates to the interface between the copper components and the ceria support, and reacts there with the oxygen supplied by the ceria support; and the oxygen deficiency on the support is replenished by the oxygen in the reaction mixture. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据