4.1 Article

A comparison of the reliabilities of four types of difference scores for five cognitive assessment batteries

期刊

出版社

HOGREFE & HUBER PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.20.3.166

关键词

reliability; difference scores; reliable component analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, studies have been conducted comparing the reliability of simple difference scores to differences computed via reliable component analysis (RCA). For the five cognitive assessment batteries examined here, RCA difference scores have been superior to simple difference scores in this regard. In the present study, the five cognitive assessment batteries are considered again, including a comparison of two alternative methods of difference score construction, the residualized and base-free difference methods, in order to determine if RCA outperforms the other methods as well. Results indicated that the RCA difference scores were more reliable in 68/70 comparisons between the four methods. When difference scores are a central part of test interpretation, clinicians should use the RCA scoring method because of the high reliability of the difference scores.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据