4.2 Article

Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis by Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenation on Fe-Based Catalysts

期刊

CATALYSIS SURVEYS FROM ASIA
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 170-183

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10563-008-9049-1

关键词

Iron catalysts; F-T synthesis; Carbon dioxide hydrogenation; Hydrocarbons

资金

  1. Korea Ministry of Commerce
  2. Industry and Energy (MOCIE)
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10028400] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impregnated and co-precipitated, promoted and unpromoted, bulk and supported iron catalysts were prepared, characterized, and subjected to hydrogenation of CO2 at various pressures (1-2 MPa) and temperatures (573-673 K). Potassium, as an important promoter, enhanced the CO2 uptake and selectivity towards olefins and long-chain hydrocarbons. Al2O3, when added as a structural promoter during co-precipitation, increased CO2 conversion as well as selectivity to C2+ hydrocarbons. Among V, Cr, Mn and Zn promoters, Zn offered the highest selectivity to C-2-C-4 alkenes. The different episodes involved in the transformation of the catalyst before it reached steady-state were identified, on the co-precipitated catalyst. Using a biomass derived syngas (CO/CO2/H-2), CO alone took part in hydrogenation. When enriched with H-2, CO2 was also converted to hydrocarbons. The deactivation of impregnated Fe-K/Al2O3 catalyst was found to be due to carbon deposition, whereas that for the precipitated catalyst was due to increase in crystallinity of iron species. The suitability of SiO2, TiO2, Al2O3, HY and ion exchanged NaY as supports was examined for obtaining high activity and selectivity towards light olefins and C2+ hydrocarbons and found Al2O3 to be the best support. A comparative study with Co catalysts revealed the advantages of Fe catalysts for hydrocarbon production by F-T synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据