4.3 Article

In vitro evaluation of normal and abnormal lungs with ultra-high-resolution CT

期刊

JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 8-15

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005382-200401000-00002

关键词

pulmonary structure; small airway; computed tomography; synchrotron radiation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synchrotron radiation microtomography is a new technique with high directionality of a synchrotron radiation beam and a high-resolution detector array. In this study, we estimated the visualization of the peripheral human lung structure with an ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (CT) system, the synchrotron radiation CT. The synchrotron radiation CT system uses the bending magnet beamline emitted from the 8.0 GeV electron storage ring. Six lung specimens were obtained at autopsy: 3 normal, I cellular alveolitis, I diffuse alveolar damage, and I pulmonary hemorrhage. Each specimen was cut down to a cylindrical sample with 6-mm diameter and 15- to 25-mm height. The synchrotron radiation CT images of these lung samples were obtained using the ultra-high-resolution image detector system with a charge coupled device (CCD) array detector (1024 x 1024 pixels with 12 x 12 mum(2) pixel size). After that, the sample specimens were sliced to 200 mum (micrometer) thickness, and were observed with a stereomicroscope and by contact radiography. Finally, approximately 10-mum thick microscopic images were obtained and compared with the synchrotron radiation CT images. The synchrotron radiation CT could depict the peripheral lung including peripheral airways, airspaces, and alveolar walls individually. Each finding in the 3 disease processes seen on the synchrotron radiation CT images correlated well with the microscopic findings. The synchrotron radiation CT allows microtomographic imaging of human lung specimens with ultra high-spatial resolution (12 mum) on a level approaching that of conventional histopathology, without sectioning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据