4.1 Article

Programmed cell death in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a mechanism of pathogenic and therapeutic importance

期刊

NEUROLOGIST
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 1-7

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.nrl.0000106920.84668.37

关键词

ALS; apoptosis; neurodegeneration; neuroprotection

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS42269, NS11766-27A1, NS38370, NS38586] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [P50NS038370, R01NS042269, P01NS011766, R01NS038586, P50NS011766] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal paralytic disease of adulthood. Mounting evidence indicates that molecular components of the programmed cell death (PCD) machinery are implicated in the demise of motor neurons in this illness. PCD, rather than being passive, is an active mechanism of cell death tightly regulated by multiple molecular pathways. Review Summary: Thus far, little is known about the etiology and the pathogenesis of ALS. However, several studies support the view that PCD is instrumental in ALS neurodegenerative process. Data from postmortem ALS specimens and from experimental models of ALS show that some dying motor neurons exhibit features reminiscent of apoptosis, a prominent morphologic form of PCD. In addition, many key molecular components of the PCD machinery are activated in ALS spinal cords. Supporting the significance of these alterations, genetic and pharmacological interventions aimed at mitigating these changes prolong survival and attenuate neurodegeneration in a mouse model of ALS. Conclusion: The morphologic evidence of PCD in ALS remains an equivocal. However, the molecular evidence of PCD involvement in ALS is compelling. Moreover, preclinical studies in mice demonstrate the beneficial effects of targeting PCD on ALS-like neurodegeneration. The neurologist needs to be familiar with the concept of PCD and the potential significance of targeting PCD as neuroprotective strategies for ALS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据