期刊
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 2-11出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0165551504041673
关键词
peer review; refereeing; reliability; journal review system; science management; knowledge management
This paper analyses the reliability of the double-blind peer review systems used for submissions to the 2001 and 2002 UK Academy for Information Systems (UKAIS) conferences. The level of reliability found in the first conference was marginally lower than would be expected from a model based on chance. in the second conference the reliability level was significantly better, but still low. The paper explores some of the implications of this for the reviewing system, and suggests a model for assessing the impact of low levels of reliability.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据