4.7 Article

Advanced glycation end products activate Smad signaling via TGF-beta-dependent and -independent mechanisms: implications for diabetic renal and vascular disease

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 176-178

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.02-1117fje

关键词

TGF-beta/Smad signaling; Smad7; AGEs and RAGE; diabetic nephropathy and vasculopathy

资金

  1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) [1-2001-596, 4-1999-821]
  2. Texas Advanced Technology Program [004949-0005-2001]
  3. National Health & Medical Research Council [164812]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While it is thought that advanced glycation end products (AGEs) act by stimulating transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta to mediate diabetic injury, we report that AGEs can activate TGF-beta signaling, Smads, and mediate diabetic scarring directly and independently of TGF-beta. AGEs activate Smad2/3 in renal and vascular cells at 5 min, peaking over 15.30 min before TGF-beta synthesis at 24 h and occurs in TGF-beta receptor I and II mutant cells. This is mediated by RAGE and ERK/p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). In addition, AGEs also activate Smads at 24 h via the classic TGF-beta-dependent pathway. A substantial inhibition of AGE-induced Smad activation and collagen synthesis by ERK/p38 MAPK inhibitors, but not by TGF-beta blockade, suggests that the MAPK-Smad signaling crosstalk pathway is a key mechanism in diabetic scarring. Prevention of AGE-induced Smad activation and collagen synthesis by overexpression of Smad7 indicates that Smad signaling may play a critical role in diabetic complications. This is further supported by the findings that activation of Smad2/3 in human diabetic nephropathy and vasculopathy is associated with local deposition of AGEs and upregulation of RAGE. Thus, AGEs act by activating Smad signaling to mediate diabetic complications via both TGF-beta-dependent and -independent pathways, shedding new light on the pathogenesis of diabetic organ injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据