4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Antibody response to DBY minor histocompatibility antigen is induced after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and in healthy female donors

期刊

BLOOD
卷 103, 期 1, 页码 353-359

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2003-03-0984

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [K08HL069132, P01HL070149] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [P01AI029530, U19AI029530] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [K08 HL069132, K08 HL69132, HL69132, HL70149, P01 HL070149] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIAID NIH HHS [P01 AI029530, AI29530, U19 AI029530] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Minor histocompatibility antigens (mHAs) recognized by donor T cells play a central role as immunologic targets of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft versus leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Men who have undergone sex-mismatched allogeneic HSCT are at high risk for GVHD because of immune responses directed against mHAs encoded by genes on the Y chromosome (termed H-Y antigens). We hypothesized that the immunogenicity of mHAs results in a coordinated response involving B cells as well as T cells. To test this, we measured antibody responses to a well-characterized H-Y antigen, dead box RNA helicase Y(DBY), and its homolog, DBX, in 150 HSCT patients. Using Western blot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), we found that 50% of male patients who received stem cell grafts from female donors developed antibody responses to recombinant DBY protein. Antibodies to DBY were also detected in 17% of healthy women, but not in healthy men. Antibody responses were directed primarily against areas of amino acid disparity between DBY and DBX. These studies demonstrate that the immune response to mHA includes the generation of specific antibodies and suggests that the serologic response to these antigens may also be useful in the identification of new mHAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据