4.7 Article

Induction of beta-cell proliferation and retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation in rat and human islets using adenovirus-mediated transfer of cyclin-dependent kinase-4 and cyclin D-1

期刊

DIABETES
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 149-159

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.53.1.149

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-55023] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK055023] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The major regulator of the gap-1/synthesis phase (G(1)/S) cell cycle checkpoint is the retinoblastoma protein (pRb), and this is regulated in part by the activities of cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk)-4 and the D cyclins. Surprisingly, given the potential importance of beta-cell replication for islet replacement therapy, pRb presence, phosphorylation status, and function have not been explored in beta-cells. Here, adenoviruses expressing cdk-4 and cyclin D, were used to explore rat and human pRb phosphorylation and beta-cell cycle control. pRb is present in rat and human islets, and overexpression of cyclin D-1/cdk-4 led to strikingly enhanced pRb phosphorylation in both species. Combined overexpression of both cdk-4 and cyclin D-1 caused a threefold increase in [H-3]thymidine incorporation. This increase in proliferation was confirmed independently using insulin and bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry, where human beta-cell replication rates were increased 10-fold. Cdk-4 or cyclin D-1 overexpression did not adversely effect beta-cell differentiation or function. The key cell cycle regulatory protein, pRb, can be harnessed to advantage using cyclin D-1/cdk-4 for the induction of human and rodent beta-cell replication, enhancing replication without adversely affecting function or differentiation. This approach will allow detailed molecular study of the cellular mechanisms regulating the cell cycle in beta-cells, beta-cell lines, and stem cell-derived beta-cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据