4.2 Article

Antimitotic effect of Selol and sodium selenate (IV) on Allium test cells

期刊

CARYOLOGIA
卷 67, 期 3, 页码 250-259

出版社

FIRENZE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1080/0144235X.2014.974353

关键词

Allium test; clastogenic aberrations; Selol; sodium selenate (IV); turbagenic aberrations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selol is a mixture of selenitetriglycerides, obtained by esterification of pre-oxidated triglycerides from sunflower oil with selenous acid. Investigations have been carried out on the anticancer use of Selol and its antimitotic properties. The aim of our work was to compare the effect of two compounds (an organic and an inorganic one) containing selenium with oxidation number at +4: Selol and sodium selenate (IV), on plant cells of Allium test. Structural changes in cells, their mitotic activity and proportions of mitotic phases were subject to experimental analysis. Incubation in both selenium compounds led to changes in structure of chromosomes, consisting in their strong condensation and contraction (cc chromosomes), accompanied by gradual reduction or complete inhibition of cell division. High concentrations of Selol led to strong condensation of chromatin in interphase cells, while cells treated with high concentrations of sodium selenate (IV) displayed typical pseudoapoptotic bodies and totally fragmented nuclei. Both compounds caused inhibition of cell division; however, sodium selenate (IV) was more effective, while low concentrations of Selol stimulated division. Use of Selol resulted in changes in chromosome structure, condensation and contraction, which made it impossible to pass to further phases of cell division. The effect of sodium selenate (IV) consisted in raised prophase index, and high concentrations led to inhibition of divisions and arrest of cells at different stages of mitosis. The results obtained show markedly lower toxicity of Selol in comparison with sodium selenate, which makes it advisable to further investigate that compound as a potential safe anticancer drug.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据