4.6 Article

Analysis of gene expression and Ig transcription in PU.1/Spi-B-deficient progenitor B cell lines

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 172, 期 1, 页码 144-154

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.1.144

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI052175] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [1R01 AI 52175-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A number of presumptive target genes for the Ets-family transcription factor PU.1 have been identified in the B cell lineage. However, the precise function of PU.1 in B cells has not been studied because targeted null mutation of the PU.1 gene results in a block to lymphomyeloid development at an early developmental stage. In this study, we take advantage of recently developed PU.1(-/-)Spi-B-/- IL-7 and stromal cell-dependent progenitor B (pro-B) cell lines to analyze the function of PU.1 and Spi-B in B cell development. We show that contrary to previously published expectations, PU.1 and/or Spi-B are not required for IgH chain (IgH) gene transcription in pro-B cells. In fact, PU.1(-/-)Spi-B-/- pro-B cells have increased levels of IgH transcription compared with wild-type pro-B cells. In addition, high levels of Igkappa transcription are induced after IL-7 withdrawal of wild-type or PU.1(-/-)Spi-B-/- pro-B cells. In contrast, we found that Iglambda transcription is reduced in PU.1(-/-)Spi-B-/- pro-B cells relative to wild-type pro-B cells after IL-7 withdrawal. These results suggest that Iglambda, but not IgH or Igkappa, transcription, is dependent on PU.1 and/or Spi-B. The PU.1(-/-)Spi-B-/- pro-B cells have other phenotypic changes relative to wild-type pro-B cells including increased proliferation, increased CD25 expression, decreased c-Kit expression, and decreased RAG-I expression. Taken together, our observations suggest that reduction of PU.1 and/or Spi-B activity in pro-B cells promotes their differentiation to a stage intermediate between late pro-B cells and large pre-B cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据