4.4 Article

Effects of PspA and antibodies to PspA on activation and deposition of complement on the pneumococcal surface

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 114-122

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.1.114-122.2004

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R29AI042183, R56AI021548, R01AI021548] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI021548, AI42183, AI21548, R56 AI021548] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Streptococcus pneumoniae infection is a frequent cause of pneumonia, otitis media, meningitis, and septicemia. Pneumococcal surface protein A (PspA) is an important virulence factor on the pathogen surface, and it is known to interfere with complement activation. In this study, flow cytometry was used to study the effects of PspA and antibodies to PspA on the deposition of complement C3 on the surface of a capsular type 3 strain, WU2, and its PspA(-) mutant, JY1119. Using naive mouse serum as a complement source, measurable deposition of C3 was observed within 4 min on PspA(-) pneumococci, and the amount of surface-bound C3 accumulated rapidly as the amount of serum was increased. In contrast, very little C3 was deposited on the PspA(+) strain. In nonimmune mouse serum, the classical pathway was the dominant activation pathway triggered by PspA(-) pneumococci. Accordingly, EGTA blocked almost all of the complement activation. Moreover, a significant amount of C3 was still deposited on the PspA(-) strain when serum from factor B-deficient mice was used. This deposition was not observed on the PspA(+) pneumococci, indicating that PspA may inhibit complement deposition via the classical pathway. Furthermore, under the conditions we tested, PspA also inhibited C3 deposition when the classical pathway was initiated by antibodies to capsular polysaccharide. Antibodies to PspA could overcome the anticomplementary effect of PspA, allowing for increased complement activation and C3 deposition onto PspA(+) bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据