4.8 Article

Sampling artifacts of acidity and ionic species in PM2.5

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 254-259

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es0342244

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although sampling artifacts of acidity, ammonium, nitrate, and chloride in airborne particulate pollutants can be reduced by the use of denuders to absorb interfering gases, artifacts due to interparticle interactions still remain. In this study, the contribution of individual artifact reactions to particle evaporation and the effects of aerosol composition on the extents of sampling artifacts in PM2.5 were investigated. Samples were collected using a Harvard honeycomb denuder/filter-pack system at an urban site and a rural site in Hong Kong. The results show that the formation of artifacts can be categorized into two regimes: ammonium rich (AR) samples with a molar ratio [NH4+]/ [SO42-] greater than 1.5 and ammonium poor (AP) samples with a molar ratio [NH4+]/[SO42-] less than or equal to 1.5. The urban samples were all AIR samples, and they were characterized by high nitrate and low in situ free acid concentrations. In contrast, the rural samples were all AP samples and they were characterized by low nitrate and high in situ free acid concentrations. We have developed a methodology to estimate the contribution of each artifact reaction to the sampling loss of nitrate, chloride, ammonium, and acidity. In the AIR samples, the evaporation of HNO3 and HCl and concomitant evaporation of NH3 were the principal reactions in determining the extent of the sampling loss of nitrate and chloride. In the AP samples, the evaporation of HNO3 and HCl alone was the principal reaction instead, especially at high sampling loss. The in situ free acid concentration, a function of aerosol composition and ambient conditions, is a more useful parameter than strong acidity in understanding the sampling loss of acidity, nitrate, and chloride from the collected particles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据