4.7 Article

Familial isolated hyperparathyroidism is rarely caused by germline mutation in HRPT2, the gene for the hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome

期刊

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2003-030675

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [Z01DK043006, Z01DK043009, ZIEDK043006, ZIADK043012, Z01DK043012, ZIEDK043009] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Familial isolated hyperparathyroidism (FIHP) can result occasionally from the incomplete expression of a syndromic form of familial hyperparathyroidism (HPT), specifically multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia, or the hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome (HPT-JT). The cause of FIHP has not been identified in the majority of families. We investigated 32 families with FIHP to determine the frequency of occult mutation in HRPT2, the gene causing HPT-JT. All families had negative clinical testing for MEN1, hypocalciuric hypercalcemia, and HPT-JT and negative mutational screening of MEN1 and CASR, the gene for the calcium-sensing receptor. Thus, an extended effort was made to exclude each of the principal syndromic causes of FIHP. The families were characterized by young probands ( 42 +/- 3 yr) and occasionally unusual parathyroid histology, including four families with one case of parathyroid cancer. We had speculated that there was a high frequency of occult mutation in HRPT2 among such carefully screened kindreds. This hypothesis became testable with the recent identification of that gene. Among the 32 FIHP families, only a single one was found to have a mutation in HRPT2 (679 in sAG); this mutation predicts premature truncation of its gene product, parafibromin, and thus its presumed inactivation. Even accounting for families with one of the three occult syndromes and false negative biochemical or DNA testing, these results indicate that an unexpectedly large fraction of FIHP has currently unrecognized causes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据