4.7 Article

Suicidality in terminally ill Japanese patients with cancer - Prevalence, patient perceptions, contributing factors, and longitudinal

期刊

CANCER
卷 100, 期 1, 页码 183-191

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11890

关键词

suicide; terminally ill; terminal care; suffering; culture

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. The risk of suicide is higher in patients with cancer than in the general population, making end-of-life care of suicidal terminal patients with cancer critical. To identify factors and longitudinal changes associated with suicidality among terminally ill Japanese patients with cancer, a prospective cohort study was performed. METHODS. Consecutive outpatients with cancer who registered with a palliative care unit participated. Structured interviews (e.g., Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R [SCID]) were conducted to assess patient suicidal ideation (Ideation) and interest in requesting euthanasia (Interest) as main outcome measures of suicidality. Possible correlated factors also were investigated. The authors analyzed the data from 140 terminally ill patients with cancer at initial study participation (baseline) whose subsequent survival time was < 6 months. Of these 140 patients, 57 (40.7%) completed the follow-up assessment after admission to the unit. RESULTS. At baseline, 8.6% of the patients had Ideation and 5.0% had Interest. Self-reported anxiety and depression was significantly associated with Ideation (P = 0.003). Changes in Ideation and Interest occurred in 38.6% and 15.8% of the patients, respectively. Ideation was more likely to change than Interest (P = 0.006). The current study did not identify factors that predict changes and occurrences of suicidal ideation and interest in requesting euthanasia. CONCLUSIONS. Suicidality can change even in terminally ill patients. End-of-life care that focuses on the psychologic distress of dying individuals may be a way of preventing suicide. (C) 2003 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据