4.5 Article

Methionine synthase D919G polymorphism, folate metabolism, and colorectal adenoma risk

期刊

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 157-162

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-03-0097

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA59045, T32-CA09661] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA059045, T32CA009661] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methionine synthase [5-methyltetrahydrofolatehomocysteine S-methyltransferase (MTR)] is involved in folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism, a pathway known to play a role in colorectal carcinogenesis. We investigated whether the MTR D919G polymorphism was associated with risk of colorectal adenoma in a colonoscopy-based study of 513 cases and 609 controls from Minneapolis, MN. Adenoma risk appeared nonsignificantly increased among women with DG or GG genotype [adjusted odds ratio (OR) versus DD, 1.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.9-2.1] but not men (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7-1.5). An interaction with methionine intake was observed among women, such that low versus high intake was associated with a 2.3-fold increased risk only among those with DG or GG genotype (95% C1, 1.1-4.9; P for interaction = 0.05). Similarly, risk associated with alcohol intake was not elevated among women with the DD genotype; however, consumption of >7 g of alcohol/ day versus none was associated with an increased risk among women with DG or GG genotype (adjusted OR, 2.5; 95% C1, 1.4-4.4; P for interaction = 0.03). An interaction between MTR D919G and the thymidylate synthase (TS or TYMS) 3'-untranslated region polymorphism 1494del6 was also observed among women (P for interaction = 0.007). No evidence of interaction with intake of folate, vitamin B-12, or vitamin B-6 or with genotype at MTHFR C677T or the TS enhancer region 28-bp repeat polymorphism was seen. These findings add to what is known about the complexities of genetic variations in one-carbon-metabolizing enzymes in relation to colorectal carcinogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据