4.5 Article

Cortical acetylcholine release and electroencephalogram activation evoked by ionotropic glutamate receptor agonists in the rat basal forebrain

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 123, 期 3, 页码 785-792

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.10.021

关键词

AMPA; NMDA; cholinergic; microdialysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine the sensitivity of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons to ionotropic glutamate receptor activation, acetylcholine was collected from the cerebral cortex of urethane-anesthetized rats using microdialysis while monitoring cortical electroencephalographic (EEG) activity. alpha-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-proprionic acid (AMPA; 1, 10, or 100 muM), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA; 100 or 1000 muM) or a combination of AMPA (10 muM) and NMDA (100 muM) was administered to the basal forebrain using reverse microdialysis. Both glutamate receptor agonists produced concentration-de pendent, several-fold increases in acetylcholine release indicating that they activated basal forebrain cholinergic neurons; AMPA was more potent, increasing acetylcholine release at a lower concentration than NMDA. The combination of AMPA and NMDA did not produce any greater release than each drug alone, indicating that the effects of these two drugs on cholinergic neurons are not additive. EEG was analyzed by fast Fourier transforms to determine the extent of physiological activation of the cortex. The highest concentrations of AMPA and NMDA tested produced small (25%) but significant increases in high frequency activity. There was a positive correlation across animals between the increases in power in the beta (14-30 Hz) and gamma (30-58 Hz) ranges and increases in acetylcholine release. These results indicate that glutamate can activate cholinergic basal forebrain neurons via both AMPA and NMDA ionotropic receptors but has a more modest effect on EEG activation. (C) 2003 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据