4.6 Article

Mn oxidation states in tri- and tetra-nuclear Mn compounds structurally relevant to photosystem II: MnK-edge X-ray absorption and K beta X-ray emission spectroscopy studies

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 6, 期 20, 页码 4864-4870

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b407513g

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R56 GM055302, R01 GM055302] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM055302] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

X-Ray spectroscopy is used to examine the effect of the manganese oxidation state for a series of Mn model compounds. Sensitive to Mn oxidation and structural symmetry, X-ray absorption and emission spectroscopy (XAS and XES) provide complementary insights. However, few benchmark examples of complexes with similar structures but in different oxidation states are available to evaluate data from unknown structures like the oxygen evolving complex (OEC) of Photosystem II (PSII). This study examines two types of compounds prepared in a variety of Mn oxidation states and which possess chemical structures with Mn-Mn interactions (similar to2.7 Angstrom and similar to3.3 Angstrom) that have been observed in the OEC. Model complexes with core compositions Mn3O and Mn4O2 contain combinations of Mn in either a reduced (II) or oxidized (III) state. Within each set of compounds, complexes with higher Mn oxidation states have absorption K-edge energy values that are higher (1.6-2.2 eV) than those of their more reduced counterparts. This trend is accordingly reversed in the Kbeta emission spectroscopy where the first moment energy values are lower (0.09-0.12 eV) for compounds with higher Mn oxidation states. We will discuss in detail, how these trends can be quantitatively used to characterize the effects of the Mn oxidation state as well as the surrounding ligand environment on the observed X-ray spectra. The results are discussed with respect to previously obtained data on different S-states of the OEC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据