4.7 Article

A pro-fibrotic role for interleukin-4 in cardiac pressure overload

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 95, 期 1, 页码 77-85

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvs142

关键词

Cardiac fibrosis; Hypertension; Interleukin-4; Mast cells; Cromolyn

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [472634]
  2. Victorian Government's OIS Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanisms underlying cardiac fibrosis in hypertension are yet to be defined, although inflammatory cells, fibroblasts, and cytokines have been implicated. Here, we investigated the role of interleukin-4 (IL-4) in cardiac fibrosis, which is elevated in the hypertensive heart. IL-4 has been shown to be pro-fibrotic in the liver and the lung, but its role in cardiac fibrosis has not been investigated. Cardiac fibrosis was induced in mice by constricting the aorta between the two carotid arteries. Fourteen days later marked left ventricular fibrosis developed together with expression of IL-4. Anti-IL-4 neutralizing antibodies attenuated this fibrosis without affecting blood pressure or expression of the transforming growth factor-beta system. The reduction in fibrosis was associated with reductions in interstitial fibroblasts and macrophages together with reductions in proliferating cells and expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). Since mast cells are a source of IL-4, we also assessed their role in fibrosis. Cromolyn, a mast cell inhibitor attenuated mast cell degranulation as well as IL-4 mRNA expression and cardiac fibrosis without affecting blood pressure. Treatment with Cromolyn also reduced interstitial fibroblasts and macrophages in regions of developing fibrosis as well MCP-1 expression. This study demonstrates for the first time that IL-4, most likely produced by mast cells in the heart during pressure overload, is a significant contributor to cardiac fibrosis. Targeting this cytokine may be a useful therapeutic strategy to limit cardiac fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据