4.5 Article

Conductivity, DSC, and solid-state NMR studies of comb-like polymer electrolyte with a chelating functional group

期刊

SOLID STATE IONICS
卷 166, 期 3-4, 页码 397-405

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2003.09.021

关键词

polyelectrolytes; copolymerzation; solid-state NMR; chelating copolymer; conductivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The behavior of lithium ions in a comb-like polymer electrolyte with a chelating functional group has been characterized by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), AC irripedance, C-13 and Li-7 solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements. The comb-like copolymer is synthesized by poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (PEGMEM) and (2-methylacrylic acid 3-(biscarboxymethylainino)-2-hydroxy-propyl ester) (GMA-IDA). Li-7 solid-state NMR spectra demonstrate the interactions of W ions with both the ether oxygen of the PEGMEM and the nitrogen atom of the GMA-IDA segments. Moreover, Li-7 solid-state NMR shows that the lithium ions are preferentially coordinated to the GMA-IDA segment. Moreover, the C-13 Solid-state NMR spectra for the carbons attached to the ether oxygen atoms exhibited significant line broadening and a slight upfield chemical shift and short T-C11 when the dopant was added to the polymer. These findings indicate coordination between the Li cation and the ether oxygens in the PEG segment. T-g increases for the copolymers doped with LiClO4. These results indicate the interactions of Li+ with both PEGMEM and GMA-IDA segments form transient cross-links. The Vogel-Tamman-Fulcher (VTF)-like behavior of conductivity implies the coupling of the charge carriers with the segmental motion of the polymer chains. The dependence of the maximum conductivity on the composition of the copolymers and the doping lithium ion concentration was determined. The GMA-IDA unit in the copolymer improves the dissociation of the lithium salt, the mechanical strength and the conductivity. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据