4.6 Review

Polymorphisms in human MDR1 (P-glycoprotein): Recent advances and clinical relevance

期刊

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 75, 期 1, 页码 13-33

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.clpt.2003.09.012

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [U01HL065962] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM054724, R55GM054724, U01GM061374, P01GM031304] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [U01 HL65962] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM54724, U01GM61374, GM31304] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drug transporters are increasingly recognized to be important to drug disposition and response. P-glycoprotein, the encoded product of the human MDR1 (ABCB1) gene, is of particular clinical relevance in that this transporter has broad substrate specificity, including a variety of structurally divergent drugs in clinical use today. Moreover, expression of this efflux transporter in certain tissue compartments such as the gastrointestinal tract and brain capillary endothelial cells limits oral absorption and central nervous system entry of many drugs. Recently, a number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in MDR1 have been identified. An increasing number of studies have also implicated certain commonly occurring SNPs in MDR1 in problems including altered drug levels and host susceptibility to diseases such as Parkinson's disease, inflammatory bowel disease, refractory seizures, and CD4 cell recovery during human immunodeficiency virus therapy. However, in many such cases, the reported effects of MDR1 SNPs have been inconsistent and, in some cases, conflicting. In this review SNPs in MDR1 in relation to population frequencies, drug levels, and phenotypes are outlined. In addition, issues relating to MDR1 haplotypes, environmental factors, and study design, as potential confounding factors of the observed MDR1 polymorphism effect in vivo, are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据