4.5 Article

Effect of acute calcium influx after mechanical stretch injury in vitro on the viability of hippocampal neurons

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 61-72

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/089771504772695959

关键词

calcium; cell death; cell mechanics; hippocampus; neuron; traumatic brain injury

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS035712] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [K08AG021527] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NIA NIH HHS [AG21527] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [NS35712] Funding Source: Medline
  5. PHS HHS [41699] Funding Source: Medline
  6. ODCDC CDC HHS [R49/CCR 312712] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We use a new in vitro model to examine the effect of mechanical deformation on neurons. We examined acute changes in cytosolic calcium concentrations ([Ca2+](i)) caused by a rapid stretch of cultured hippocampal neurons, using mechanical loading conditions that mimic brain deformations during trauma. We found that stretch-injury of neurons induces a strain-dependent increase in [Ca2+](i). Remarkably, the extent of this calcium response exceeded the levels initiated by chemical toxicity with NMDA (100 muM) or glutamate (5 mM) exposure. Propidium iodide labeling at 24 h following stretch showed neuronal death occurred only at the most severe level of mechanical injury. Although NMDA-induced toxicity could be inhibited in calcium free media or by treatment with MK-801, stretch-induced neuronal death was not similarly reduced with either treatment. Unexpectedly, reduction of the acute stretch-induced calcium transient with calcium-free media or MK-801 resulted in an increase in neuronal death at lower stretch levels. These data suggest that mechanical stretch can initiate calcium influx in hippocampal neurons, but substantially modulating the early calcium flux from the extracellular space or through the NMDA channel does not provide an effective means for improving neuronal survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据