4.8 Article

Annexin II regulates fibrin homeostasis and neoangiogenesis in vivo

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 113, 期 1, 页码 38-48

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI200419684

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL042493, P01HL067839, P01HL046403] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL46403, P01 HL046403, HL67839, T32 HL007423, R01 HL042493, HL07423, P01 HL067839, HL42493] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A central tenet of fibrinolysis is that tissue plasminogen activator-dependent (t-PA-dependent) conversion of plasminogen to active plasmin requires the presence of the cofactor/substrate fibrin. However, previous in vitro studies have suggested that the endothelial cell surface protein annexin 11 can stimulate t-PA-mediated plasminogen activation in the complete absence of fibrin. Here, homozygous annexin II-null mice displayed deposition of fibrin in the microvasculature and incomplete clearance of injury-induced arterial thrombi. While these animals demonstrated normal lysis of a fibrin-containing plasma clot, t-PA-dependent plasmin generation at the endothelial cell surface was markedly deficient. Directed migration of annexin II-null endothelial cells through fibrin and collagen lattices in vitro was also reduced, and an annexin II peptide mimicking sequences necessary for t-PA binding blocked endothelial cell invasion of Matrigel implants in wild-type mice. In addition, annexin II-deficient mice displayed markedly diminished neovascularization of fibroblast growth factor-stimulated cornea and of oxygen-primed neonatal retina. Capillary sprouting from annexin II-deficient aortic ring explants was markedly reduced in association with severe impairment of activation of metalloproteinase-9 and -13. These data establish annexin 11 as a regulator of cell surface plasmin generation and reveal that impaired endothelial cell fibrinolytic activity constitutes a barrier to effective neoangiogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据