4.7 Review

Metabolic fingerprint of ischaemic cardioprotection: importance of the malate-aspartate shuttle

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 91, 期 3, 页码 382-391

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvr051

关键词

Malate-aspartate shuttle; Carbohydrate metabolism; Infarct size; Ischaemia; Reperfusion

资金

  1. Fondation Leducq [06CVD]
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The convergence of cardioprotective intracellular signalling pathways to modulate mitochondrial function as an end-target of cytoprotective stimuli is well described. However, our understanding of whether the complementary changes in mitochondrial energy metabolism are secondary responses or inherent mechanisms of ischaemic cardio-protection remains incomplete. In the heart, the malate-aspartate shuttle (MAS) constitutes the primary metabolic pathway for transfer of reducing equivalents from the cytosol into the mitochondria for oxidation. The flux of MAS is tightly linked to the flux of the tricarboxylic acid cycle and the electron transport chain, partly by the amino acid L-glutamate. In addition, emerging evidence suggests the MAS is an important regulator of cytosolic and mitochondrial calcium homeostasis. In the isolated rat heart, inhibition of MAS during ischaemia and early reperfusion by the aminotransferase inhibitor aminooxyacetate induces infarct limitation, improves haemodynamic responses, and modulates glucose metabolism, analogous to effects observed in classical ischaemic preconditioning. On the basis of these findings, the mechanisms through which MAS preserves mitochondrial function and cell survival are reviewed. We conclude that the available evidence is supportive of a down-regulation of mitochondrial respiration during lethal ischaemia with a gradual 'wake-up' during reperfusion as a pivotal feature of ischaemic cardioprotection. Finally, comments on modulating myocardial energy metabolism by the cardioprotective amino acids glutamate and glutamine are given.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据