4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Cognitive impairment in older HIV-1-seropositive individuals: prevalence and potential mechanisms

期刊

AIDS
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 S79-S86

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200401001-00012

关键词

aging; AIDS; cognition; dementia; HIV

资金

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [U54RR014607, P20RR011091, G12RR003061] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [U54NS043049] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCRR NIH HHS [P20 RR11091, G12 RR003061, P20 RR011091, G12 RR/AI 03061] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [1U54NS, U54 NS043049] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Individuals over 50 years of age comprise 11% of AIDS cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A higher prevalence of AIDS in older individuals has been reported in certain states including Hawaii (20%) and Florida (13%). Although life expectancy in individuals with AIDS has increased with advances in antiretroviral therapy, it is likely that there are health consequences both of long-term infection and chronic antiretroviral therapy. Given the general increase in neurological disorders with age and the relatively high prevalence of cognitive dysfunction associated with HIV itself, the risk of HIV-associated dementia (HAD) in this aging HIV-seropositive subgroup is of particular concern. Existing data suggest, but have not conclusively demonstrated, increased rates of HAD in older compared with younger seropositive individuals. Preliminary data from the Hawaii Aging with HIV Cohort, a prospective cohort study designed to address this issue definitively, are presented. Factors underlying this hypothesized susceptibility in older individuals are discussed, including a synergy among HAD and other dementias, the role of vascular copathology, HIV and age-related immunological changes, and detrimental neuroglial changes that limit the compensatory ability of the aging brain. (C) 2004 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据