4.7 Article

Late-phase detection of recent myocardial ischaemia using ultrasound molecular imaging targeted to intercellular adhesion molecule-1

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 89, 期 1, 页码 175-183

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvq269

关键词

Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1); Microbubbles; Molecular imaging; Myocardial ischaemia; Contrast echocardiography

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2006AA02Z478]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30870722]
  3. Department of Education of Guangdong Provincial Government
  4. Southern Medical University, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims In this study, we attempted to detect a recent myocardial ischaemic event using ultrasound molecular imaging (UMI) with microbubbles (MB) targeted to intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in the late phase of reperfusion. Methods and results We created a myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion model in 60 C57/BL male mice to simulate an angina attack (ischaemia for 15 min, reperfusion for 1-24 h). The degree of myocardial inflammation and levels of ICAM-1 protein were determined by histological and immunohistochemical analyses. UMI with MB targeted to endothelial ICAM-1, as well as routine non-invasive methods including electrocardiography, echocardiography, and plasma troponin I levels, were utilized to evaluate ischaemia over the time course of reperfusion. Levels of ICAM-1 in the vascular endothelium were significantly increased over the time course of reperfusion (8-24 h) of the ischaemic myocardium. The video intensity of ICAM-1 molecular images of the ischaemic anterior wall was almost three times greater than that in the non-ischaemic posterior wall during the late phase (8-24 h) of reperfusion. In contrast, routine methods yielded only weak evidence of ischaemia. Conclusion UMI with MB targeted to endothelial ICAM-1 provides reliable evidence of a recent myocardial ischaemic event in the late phase of reperfusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据