4.7 Article

Serine protease activation of near-silent epithelial Na+ channels

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 286, 期 1, 页码 C190-C194

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00342.2003

关键词

silent channels; protease; epithelial Na+ transport; cystic fibrosis; hypertension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The regulation of epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) function is critical for normal salt and water balance. This regulation is achieved through cell surface insertion/ retrieval of channels, by changes in channel open probability (P-o), or through a combination of these processes. Epithelium-derived serine proteases, including channel activating protease (CAP) and prostasin, regulate epithelial Na+ transport, but the molecular mechanism is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that extracellular serine proteases activate a near-silent ENaC population resident in the plasma membrane. Single-channel events were recorded in outside-out patches from fibroblasts (NIH/3T3) stably expressing rat alpha-, beta-, and gamma-subunits (rENaC), before and during exposure to trypsin, a serine protease homologous to CAP and prostasin. Under baseline conditions, near-silent patches were defined as having rENaC activity (NPo) < 0.03, where N is the number of channels. Within 1 - 5 min of 3 mu g/ml bath trypsin superfusion, NPo increased similar to 66-fold ( n = 7). In patches observed to contain a single functional channel, trypsin increased P-o from 0.02 +/- 0.01 to 0.57 +/- 0.03 ( n = 3, mean +/- SE), resulting from the combination of an increased channel open time and decreased channel closed time. Catalytic activity was required for activation of near-silent ENaC. Channel conductance and the Na+/ Li+ current ratio with trypsin were similar to control values. Modulation of ENaC P-o by endogenous epithelial serine proteases is a potentially important regulator of epithelial Na+ transport, distinct from the regulation achieved by hormone-induced plasma membrane insertion of channels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据