4.6 Article

Chronic exposure to the carcinogenic compound benzo[a]pyrene induces larger and phenotypically different atherosclerotic plaques in ApoE-knockout mice

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 164, 期 1, 页码 101-108

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63101-X

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) is a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon with atherogenic and carcinogenic properties. The role of B[a]P in carcinogenesis is well established, and thought to exert via enzymatic activation into reactive metabolites that are capable of binding to the DNA leading to uncontrolled proliferation. However, the mechanism underlying the atherogenic properties of B[a]P is still unclear. Therefore, the effects of chronic B[a]P exposure on atherosclerotic plaque development in apolipoprotein E knockout (apoE-KO) mice were studied. ApoE-KO mice were orally treated with 5 mg/kg/bw B[a]P once per week for 12 or 24 consecutive weeks. Levels of reactive B[a]P metabolites in the arterial tree (from the aortic arch until the iliac artery bifurcations) were high as shown by the level of B[a]P DNA-binding products measured in DNA isolated from the entire aorta (38.9 +/- 4.8 adducts/10(8) nucleotides). Analysis of atherosclerotic lesions in the aortic arch showed no influence of B[a]P on location or number of lesions. Moreover, no increased levels of P53 nuclear protein accumulation or cell proliferation, as detected by immunohistochemistry, were seen in the plaques of the B[a]P-exposed animals. However, the effects of B[a]P on advanced lesions were obvious: advanced plaques were larger and more prone to lipid core development and plaque layering at both 12 and 24 weeks (P < 0.05). In the B[a]P-exposed animals advanced plaques contained more T-lymphocytes and macrophages than in the control animals at both end points (P < 0.05). These data suggest that B[a]P does not initiate atherosclerosis in apoE-KO mice, but accelerates the progression of atherosclerotic plaques via a local inflammatory response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据