4.7 Article

Lipopolysaccharide-induced myocardial protection against ischaemia/reperfusion injury is mediated through a PI3K/Akt-dependent mechanism

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 78, 期 3, 页码 546-553

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvn037

关键词

lipopolysaccharide; myocardium; cardioprotection; TLR/NF kappa B pathway; PI3K/Akt activity

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL071837] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM53552] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alms The ability of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) pre-treatment to induce cardioprotection following ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) has been well documented; however, the mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. LPS is a Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) ligand. Recent evidence indicates that there is cross-talk between the TLR and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt (PI3K/Akt) signalling pathways. We hypothesized that activation of PI3K/Akt signalling plays a critical role in LPS-induced cardioprotection. Methods and results To evaluate this hypothesis, we pre-treated mice with LPS 24 h before the hearts were subjected to ischaemia (45 min) and reperfusion (4 h). We examined activation of the PI3K/Akt/GSK-3 beta signalling pathway. The effect of PI3K/Akt inhibition on LPS-induced cardioprotection was also evaluated. LPS pre-treatment significantly reduced infarct size (71.25%) compared with the untreated group (9.3 +/- 1.58 vs. 32.3 +/- 2.92%, P < 0.01). Cardiac myocyte apoptosis and caspase-3 activity in LPS-pre-treated mice were significantly reduced following I/R. LPS pre-treatment significantly increased the levels of phospho-Akt, phospho-GSK-3 beta, and heat shock protein 27 in the myocardium. Pharmacological inhibition of PI3K by LY294002 or genetic modulation employing kinase-defective Akt transgenic mice abolished the cardioprotection induced by LPS. Conclusion These results indicate that LPS-induced cardioprotection in I/R injury is mediated through a PI3K/Akt-dependent mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据