4.3 Article

Antioxidant and free radical-scavenging activity of Choto-san and its related constituents

期刊

BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 38-46

出版社

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.27.38

关键词

Choto-san; Chotoko; oxidative stress; free radical; antioxidant; NG108-15 cell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The antioxidant properties of Choto-san and its related constituents such as Chotoko and Choto-san without Chotoko, and phenolic compounds contained in Chotoko such as epicatechin, caffeic, acid and quercetin were evaluated. In the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging assay, the scavenging activity of Chotoko (IC50 14.3 mug/ml) was found to be higher than that of Choto-san (IC50 206.2 mug/ml) and Choto-san without Chotoko (IC50 244.3 mug/ml). Epicatechin (IC50 10.4 muM), caffeic acid IC50 13.8 mug/ml), and quercetin IC50 7.1 muM) also revealed scavenging activity against DPPH radicals. Choto-san IC50 67.7 mug/ml) exhibited stronger inhibitory activity against superoxide anion formation than Choto-san without Chotoko IC50 92.4 mug/ml) but weaker activity than Chotoko IC50 18.3 mug/ml). The generation of superoxide anion was also inhibited by epicatechin IC50 175.2 muM), caffeic acid (IC50 141.7 muM), and quercetin (IC50 18.7 muM). In a hydroxyl radical-scavenging experiment, Choto-san IC50 2.4 mg/ml), Chotoko IC50 2.2 mg/ml), Choto-san without Chotoko (IC50 2.8 mg/ml), epicatechin IC50 3.9 mm), caffeic acid (IC50 3.6 mm), and quercetin UC50 1.9 mm) exhibited activity. In NG108-15 cells, when added simultaneously with H2O2 (500 muM), Choto-san (250 mug/ml), Chotoko (250 mug/ml), Choto-san without Chotoko (500 mug/ml), epicatechin (200 muM), caffeic acid (200 muM), and quercetin (200 muM) effectively protected cells from oxidative damage. In conclusion, the present results provide evidence that Choto-san acts as an antioxidant and cytoprotective agent against oxidative damage, which is due at least partly to the phenolic compounds contained in Chotoko.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据