4.7 Article

Hydrogen sulphide is an inhibitor of L-type calcium channels and mechanical contraction in rat cardiomyocytes

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 79, 期 4, 页码 632-641

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvn140

关键词

calcium; ion channels; myocytes

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2007CB512006]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30470628]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) is an endogenously generated gaseous transmitter that has recently been suggested to regulate cardiovascular functions. To date, there is no direct evidence for a potential role of H2S in regulating calcium channels in the heart. The present study aims to examine the hypothesis that H2S is a novel inhibitor of the L-type calcium channel current (I-Ca,I-L). Methods and results Electrophysiological measurements were performed in cardiomyocytes isolated from Wistar-Kyoto and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Bath application of 100 mu M NaHS (a H2S donor) significantly reduced the time required for the repolarization of the action potential. Inhibition of the peak I-Ca,I-L by NaHS was determined to be concentration-dependent (25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 mu M). NaHS inhibited the recovery from depolarization-induced inactivation. Electric field-induced [Ca2+]i transients and contraction of single cardiomyocytes and isolated papillary muscles were reduced by NaHS treatment. In contrast, caffeine induced an increase in [Ca2+]i that was riot altered by NaHS. NaHS had no effect on the K-ATP current or on the levels of cAMP and cGMP in the current study. Conclusion H2S is a novel inhibitor of L-type calcium channels in cardionnyocytes. Moreover, H2S-induced inhibition of [Ca2+] i appears to be a secondary effect owing to its initial action towards I-Ca,I-L. The inhibitory effect of H2S on I-Ca,I-L requires further investigation, particularly in the exploration of new pathways involved in cardiac calcium homeostasis and disease pathology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据