4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Arsenite induces HIF-1 alpha and VEGF through PI3K, Akt and reactive oxygen species in DU145 human prostate carcinoma cells

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 255, 期 1-2, 页码 33-45

出版社

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/B:MCBI.0000007259.65742.16

关键词

hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1); vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); reactive oxygen species (ROS); phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K); Akt; mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK); MAP kinase kinase (MEK)

资金

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P20RR016440] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [RR16440] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arsenite is widely distributed environmental toxicant in water, food and air. It is a known human carcinogen, which is strongly associated with human cancers originated from liver, nasal cavity, lung, skin, bladder, kidney, and prostate. In this study, we investigated whether arsenite induces expression of hypoxia- inducible factor 1 ( HIF- 1). HIF- 1 is a heterodimeric basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, composed of HIF- 1alpha and HIF- 1beta/ ARNT subunits; and is involved in tumor growth and angiogenesis. Here we demonstrate that arsenite induces the expression of HIF- 1alpha but not HIF- 1beta subunit in DU145 human prostate carcinoma cells. Arsenite also increases the expression of VEGF through the induction of HIF- 1. We also found that arsenite activates PI3K and Akt that are required for arsenite- induced expression of HIF- 1alpha and VEGF. The induction of HIF- 1 and VEGF by arsenite can not be inhibited by MAP kinase inhibitors. Arsenite causes production of reactive oxygen species ( ROS). The major species of ROS required for the induction of HIF- 1 and VEGF is H2O2. These data indicate that the arsenite- induced activation of PI3K/ Akt signaling and the expression of HIF- 1 and VEGF through the generation of ROS could be an important mechanism in the arsenite- induced carcinogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据