4.2 Article

Chemopreventive effects of vanadium toward 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced genotoxicity and preneoplastic lesions in rat colon

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 113-118

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/em.20038

关键词

rat colon carcinogenesis; 1,2-dimethylhydrazine; vanadium; comet assay; chromosomal aberrations; DNA damage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, we have evaluated the antitumor effects of vanadium by monitoring DNA damage and chromosomal aberrations (CAs) during the early preneoplastic stage of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (1,2-DMH)-induced colon cancer in male rats. Treatment with 20 mg/kg 1,2-DMH for 6 weeks resulted in the formation of aberrant crypt foci (ACF), a putative preneoplastic lesion associated with colon cancer development, while cotreatment with ammonium monovanodate (0.5 ppm in the drinking water) reduced ACF formation by 50% (P < 0.001). The 6-week treatment with 1,2-DMH also resulted in significantly higher levels of DNA damage in rat colon as measured by the Comet assay (higher mean values for length-to-width ratios (L:W) of DNA mass (P < 0.01) and mean frequencies of cells with comets (P < 0.001)). The vanadium cotreatment reduced DNA damage in colon cells by 32% (P < 0.02 and P < 0.001 for L:W and tailed cells, respectively). 1,2-DMH treatment also produced a 10-fold increase in the frequency of CAs in rat colon (P < 0.001), while cotreatment with vanadium resulted in a reduction in CAs after 2, 4, and 6 weeks of 1,2-DMH exposure (P < 0.01). Analysis of antioxidant defense enzyme activity in colonic mucosa indicated that glutathione reductase and catalase activities were increased in 1,2-DMH-treated rats; cotreatment with vanadium reduced these activities when compared to the carcinogen control (P < 0.001 and P < 0.02). These results demonstrate that the early protective effect of vanadium in chemically induced rat colon carcinogenesis may be mediated by a reduction of carcinogen-induced DNA damage. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据