4.4 Article

High frequency of melanoma-associated antigen or HLA class I loss does not correlate with survival in primary melanoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 73-78

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002371-200401000-00007

关键词

melanoma-associated antigens; HLA class I; immunotherapy; MAGE-3; MelanA/MART-1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Melanoma-associated antigens are at the center of many immunotherapeutic trials in melanoma. Little is known about the impact of antigen expression on the natural course of disease. We stained 110 cases of primary melanoma with a median follow-up of 13 years (range 10-18 years) for melanoma-associated antigens gp100, MelanA/MART-1, MAGE-3, tyrosinase, and for HLA class I molecules. Of 91 cases evaluated, we found immunoreactivity for gp 100, MelanA/MART-1, and tyrosinase in 88%, 80%, and 87% of primary tumors, respectively, for MAGE-3 in 37% and for HLA class I in 86% of primary tumors. Loss, that is, heterogeneous expression within primary tumors, was most pronounced for gp 100 (73% of primary tumors) and least for MAGE-3 (27% of primary tumors). MelanA/MART-1 and tyrosinase expression loss was 58% and 59% of primary tumors, respectively. There was a high rate of expression loss for HLA class I (74%). Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis of expression in primary tumors and loss of melanoma antigens as well as HLA class I in individual primary tumors showed no significant correlation to overall survival. Loss of gp100 and loss of tyrosinase expression showed a negative survival trend over homogeneous expression of these antigens, although not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.08 and P = 0.09, respectively). We conclude that loss of melanoma antigen expression as well as HLA class I expression is a frequent observation in primary melanoma. However, no statistically significant correlation between loss of these antigens in individual primary tumors and negative impact on overall survival was found in our cohort.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据