4.5 Article

Matrix metalloproteinases MMP-2,-9 and tissue inhibitors TIMP-1,-2 expression and secretion by primary human osteoblast cells in response to titanium, zirconia, and alumina ceramics

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.20001

关键词

human osteoblasts; matrix metalloproteinases; biomaterials; osseointegration; extracellular matrix

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteogenic properties of bone cells are a key parameter governing osseointegration of implant devices. In this context, osteoblasts have a central role via extracellular matrix synthesis and remodeling that they regulate through different protease activity. In this study, we have analyzed the expression of two matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs): MMP-2 (72 kDa) and MMP-9 (92 kDa) and their specific tissue inhibitors TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 in primary human osteoblastic cells. The effect of titanium, zirconia, and alumina ceramics on the synthesis of these proteases was assessed using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and zymographic analysis. Our results showed that osteoblasts express MMP-2 and -9 mRNA. Furthermore, MMP-2 mRNA expression was decreased by titanium and increased by alumina whereas zirconia did not have any significant effect. Conversely, MMP-9 mRNA expression was stimulated by titanium but decreased with zirconia, whereas alumina induced no significant changes. Zymographic analysis has evidenced pro-MMP-2 gelatinolyfic activity in all cell populations with time-dependent increase profile; pro-MMP-9, however, was not detected. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay data confirmed the production of MMP-2 and very low levels of MMP-9. In addition, TIMP-1 was secreted in 24-h cultured cells and increased to maximal level at 48-72 h whereas TIMP-2 levels were very low. The interactions between human osteoblasts and the studied biomaterials altered both MMP-2, -9 and TIMP-1expression indicating that biomaterials may influence osseointegration and bone remodeling. (C) 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据