4.7 Article

The effect of cardiovascular risk factors on the longitudinal evolution of the carotid intima medial thickness in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR DIABETOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-10-53

关键词

Intima medial thickness; subclinical atherosclerosis; Type 1 diabetes mellitus; Follow up study; cardiovascular risk factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Type 1 diabetes mellitus is a generally accepted atherogenic risk factor. The aim of this prospective longitudinal study was to evaluate changes in carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) using standardized methods. Methods: We re-evaluated cIMT in 70 (38 f) of initial 150 (80 f) patients with T1DM after 4 years. At re-evaluation, mean (+/- SD) age was 16.45 +/- 2.59 y, mean diabetes duration was 9.2 +/- 3.24 y and patients had a mean HbA1c of 8.14 +/- 1.06%. Results: Mean cIMT z-scores increased significantly during 4 years (0.58 +/- 0.75, p < 0.001) as well as BMI-z-score (0.41 +/- 0.81, p < 0.01), systolic blood pressure (0.77 +/- 1.15, p < 0.01) and HbA1c (0.90 +/- 1.07, < 0.001). In a linear regression model systolic blood pressure z-score at first measurement (0.02, CI: 0.01, 0.04) was a significant predictor for the mean effect on cIMT z-score. In a logistic regression model significant risk factors for an increase in IMT of >= 1.5 z-scores were BMI z-scores (OR: 3.02, CI: 1.11, 10.14), diabetes duration (OR: 1.32, CI: 1.04, 1.77) and systolic blood pressure (OR: 1.14, CI: 1.04, 1.27) at first measurement each. Conclusions: Longitudinal cIMT measurements revealed progression in subclinical atherosclerosis during a four year period in diabetic children and adolescents. Systolic blood pressure and BMI were related to cIMT increment. Control of these risk factors by lifestyle and medical intervention may prevent progression of cIMT in diabetic children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据