4.2 Article

Measuring effectiveness of drugs in observational databanks: promises and perils

期刊

ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 41-44

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/ar1151

关键词

bias; cohort study; confounding; data banks; randomized controlled trial; rheumatoid arthritis

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [P01AR043584] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR43584, P01 AR043584] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Observational databanks have inherent strengths and shortcomings. As in randomized controlled trials, poor design of these databanks can either exaggerate or reduce estimates of drug effectiveness and can limit generalizability. This commentary highlights selected aspects of study design, data collection and statistical analysis that can help overcome many of these inadequacies. An international metaRegister and a formal mechanism for standardizing and sharing drug data could help improve the utility of databanks. Medical journals have a vital role in enforcing a quality checklist that improves reporting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据